Uses and Limitations of
Growth Data
Jonathan Dings
Boulder Valley School District
June 22, 2009
jonathan.dings@bvsd.org
Overview
• Setting Meaningful Goals for
Continuous Improvement
• Metrics that Incentivize
Productive Responses
• Contextualizing Growth Data
to Provoke Thoughtful Use
• Avoiding Over-Interpretation
Continuous Improvement Model
Plan of Action Assess Current Reality
Vision
Set SMART Goals Why Are We Getting
These Results?
• Achievement
• Equity
• Climate
Theory of Action
If ….Then….and X will result BayCES, 2002
Assessing Our Results
■ What are the trends over time?
■ What are the trends for groups?
■ How did overall achievement change,
compared to the same students’ achievement
last year?
■ How does the change compare to a standards-
based or norms-based idea of a year’s growth?
■ How does the change differ by groups?
■ How do achievement data compare with school
climate, parent, staff and NCG survey results?
Colorado Student Assessment Program
•Grades 3-10 Read/Write/Math; Sci at 5,8,10
•Based on Content Standards
•Standardized Administration to Nearly All
Students, with Accommodations Available
•Selected- and Open-Response Questions
•CSAP Development Process and Statistical
Evidence Support Making Inferences from
Results
•Growth Data More Relevant for Many
Purposes than Achievement
A Relatively New Metric: Colorado’s Growth
Model
■ Easier to use and understand than
the previous methods
■ Supported by a useful video
■ CDE graphs available online by
district and school
■ Current year results arrived at a later
than ideal time for full use
Colorado Median Growth Percentile
■ Amount of gain is statistically compared
across students starting from the same
point (“academic peers”)
■ Growth percentile assigned: percent of
“academic peers” making that amount of
gain or less
■ Percentiles range from 1 to 99, can be
compared with state median of 50
■ Accountability Measure: the middle growth
%-ile
Several View of BVSD Writing Data
Colorado’s Growth Model
■ District
■ Grade
■ Race/Ethnicity
District Median Growth %-ile
Overall
Eng Home La
ELL
Meal Assist
Special Ed
Productive Response to Median
Growth Percentile
■ Users are far less dismissive of gaps
in growth than in achievement
■ Because a student’s growth is not
readily predicted, raising median
growth requires group improvement
■ Reflection on what went well for
students with high growth
School and Teacher Use
■ Fair comparison across content
areas
■ Encouraged for use in school goal
setting, especially around equity
■ Published at student level in Student
Information System (Infinite
Campus), contextualized with
grades, demographics, simple gain
School Results, vs. District
Student Roster in IC
Teacher level results
Avoiding Over-Interpretation
■ Contextualize with Error Estimates
■ Examine Multiple Content Areas
and Years of Results for Each
Student
■ Consider Likely Response of
Parents, Having Seen Percentiles
only for Achievement, not Growth
About this copy
Uses and Limitations of Growth Data — CCSSO, June 2009.
This is an image-based copy of the original PowerPoint slides; builds and animations are flattened.