Exploring Student Growth in Missouri Changing Conversations about Education

Missouri Department of Education · March 25, 2010

Exploring Student Growth in Missouri Changing Conversations about Education — Missouri Department of Education, March 25, 2010.
Published

March 25, 2010

Event
State agency
Slides
25
Format
Converted from PDF

This deck is an image-based copy of the original slides. Builds and animations are flattened; the slide text is reproduced below for search and screen readers.

Slide text
  1. The Big Picture Guiding Principals and Questions The Colorado Growth Model New Directions Exploring Student Growth in Missouri Changing Conversations about Education Damian W. Betebenner National Center for the Improvement of Educational Assessment Dover, New Hampshire Measuring Teacher and Leader Effect Work Group Columbia, Missouri March 25th, 2010 Damian W. Betebenner Student Growth in Missouri
  2. The Big Picture Guiding Principals and Questions The Colorado Growth Model New Directions About Me Dr. Damian Betebenner, PhD Senior Associate at the Center for Assessment (NCIEA). De- veloped student growth percentiles and percentile growth tra- jectories to help states and educational associations em- ploy student growth in decision making [Betebenner, 2008, Betebenner, 2009]. Currently refining and sharing these tech- niques with other states including Colorado, Massachusetts, Arizona, Indiana, as well as at least 15 other states in various stages of investigation/adoption. Damian W. Betebenner Student Growth in Missouri
  3. The Big Picture Guiding Principals and Questions The Colorado Growth Model New Directions Today’s Topics Questions that a growth model can/should address. Student growth percentiles. Student growth versus value-added Changing conversations around education using growth data. Damian W. Betebenner Student Growth in Missouri
  4. The Big Picture The Data Revolution Guiding Principals and Questions Why Growth? The Colorado Growth Model Accountability and Growth New Directions Data Data Everywhere Enhanced data acquisition and management has enabled: Historical records of student achievement Historical records of student demographics, teachers, schools, educational programs, . . . Stakeholder interest in an examination of this longitudinal data Interest in examining student achievement over time (student growth) derives from data availability. Damian W. Betebenner Student Growth in Missouri
  5. The Big Picture The Data Revolution Guiding Principals and Questions Why Growth? The Colorado Growth Model Accountability and Growth New Directions The attractiveness of growth What is growth and why measure it? Student learning is a central goal of education. Assessments of student achievement provide evidence of the current status of student knowledge and understanding. Learning is demonstrated by growth in student achievement from one point in time to another point in time–not by status at either point time alone. Damian W. Betebenner Student Growth in Missouri
  6. The Big Picture The Data Revolution Guiding Principals and Questions Why Growth? The Colorado Growth Model Accountability and Growth New Directions Accountability & Growth Growth versus Status Enthusiasm for growth in accountability stems from the belief that growth and teacher/school quality are more closely related than status. Enthusiasm for growth also stems from its potential diagnostic uses. How do we judge the use of growth related measures within an accountability system? Damian W. Betebenner Student Growth in Missouri
  7. The Big Picture Guiding Principals and Questions Guiding Principals The Colorado Growth Model Guiding Questions New Directions Guiding principals John Tukey It is better to have an approximate answer to the right question than a precise answer to the wrong question. George E. P. Box All models are wrong but some are useful. Start at the end and work backward The best growth model answers the questions of greatest rele- vance to stakeholders. Damian W. Betebenner Student Growth in Missouri
  8. The Big Picture Guiding Principals and Questions Guiding Principals The Colorado Growth Model Guiding Questions New Directions Guiding questions Growth models address specific questions Different growth analysis techniques are good at answering different questions. It is critical to understand these different questions. Different questions lead to different conversations which lead to different uses and outcomes. Changing conversations about education Starting with the right questions simplifies development and motivating the proper use of the growth model results. It’s all about the conversations you want to have. The questions set the table for those conversations. Damian W. Betebenner Student Growth in Missouri
  9. The Big Picture Guiding Principals and Questions Guiding Principals The Colorado Growth Model Guiding Questions New Directions What are the relevant questions for parents? Yen (2007), from a state survey of parents, teachers and administrators, compiled a list of frequently voiced questions/concerns by stakeholder group. Parent Questions Did my child make a year’s worth of progress in a year? Is my child growing appropriately toward meeting state standards? Is my child growing as much in Math as Reading? Did my child grow as much this year as last year? Damian W. Betebenner Student Growth in Missouri
  10. The Big Picture Guiding Principals and Questions Guiding Principals The Colorado Growth Model Guiding Questions New Directions What are the relevant questions for teachers? Yen (2007), from a state survey of parents, teachers and administrators, compiled a list of frequently voiced questions/concerns by stakeholder group. Teacher Questions Did my students make a year’s worth of progress in a year? Did my students grow appropriately toward meeting state standards? How close are my students to becoming Proficient? Are there students with unusually low growth who need special attention? Damian W. Betebenner Student Growth in Missouri
  11. The Big Picture Guiding Principals and Questions Guiding Principals The Colorado Growth Model Guiding Questions New Directions What are the relevant questions for administrators? Yen (2007), from a state survey of parents, teachers and administrators, compiled a list of frequently voiced questions/concerns by stakeholder group. Administrator Questions Did the students in our district/school make a year’s worth of progress in all content areas? Are our students growing appropriately toward meeting state standards? Does this school/program show as much growth as that one? Can I measure student growth even for students who do not change proficiency categories? Can I pool together results from different grades to draw summary conclusions? Damian W. Betebenner Student Growth in Missouri
  12. The Big Picture Describing Student Growth Guiding Principals and Questions Combining Actual and Aspirational Growth The Colorado Growth Model Growth & Effectiveness New Directions The Colorado Growth Model How much growth did a student make? Is it enough? An important first step in the development of the Colorado Growth Model was to separate the description of growth from discussions of responsibility (i.e., accountability). Incorporating growth into accountability follows more easily from the viable description of growth. A viable description of growth facilitates stakeholder engagement and investigations of responsibility for good/bad growth. This in turn leads to greater stakeholder support for particular forms of accountability. Damian W. Betebenner Student Growth in Missouri
  13. The Big Picture Describing Student Growth Guiding Principals and Questions Combining Actual and Aspirational Growth The Colorado Growth Model Growth & Effectiveness New Directions Describing student growth Measuring student growth, even with a vertical scale, is not a simple task. Some believe a vertical scale simplifies the task of measuring student growth. Even with an interval (or ratio) scale, growth is not easy to interpret. Consider, for example, height. A child might grow 4 inches between ages 3 and 4. 4 inches is a well understood quantity. The 4 inch increase becomes really meaningful only when understood alongside the growth of other 3 to 4 year olds. Student growth percentiles were developed to provide a normative context for describing student growth. Damian W. Betebenner Student Growth in Missouri
  14. The Big Picture Describing Student Growth Guiding Principals and Questions Combining Actual and Aspirational Growth The Colorado Growth Model Growth & Effectiveness New Directions Student Growth Percentiles Should we be surprised with a child’s current achievement given their prior achievement? Student growth percentiles answer this question. Consider a low achieving student with 90th percentile growth and a high achieving student with 10th percentile growth. The low achieving student grew at a rate exceeding 90 percent of similar students. The high achieving student grew at a rate exceeding just 10 percent of similar students. The low achiever’s growth is more exemplary (probabilistically) than the high achiever’s. Judgments about the adequacy of student growth require external criteria. Damian W. Betebenner Student Growth in Missouri
  15. The Big Picture Describing Student Growth Guiding Principals and Questions Combining Actual and Aspirational Growth The Colorado Growth Model Growth & Effectiveness New Directions Combining norms and standards Growth adequacy is determined by whether a student’s growth is sufficient to reach/maintain desired achievement levels (e.g., proficiency). A next step for the Archdiocese is to consider establishing performance standards (ideally linked to content standards) that can be used to qualify student achievement. With established performance standards, percentile growth projections/trajectories are calculated for each student to reach/maintain desired levels of achievement. Damian W. Betebenner Student Growth in Missouri
  16. Advanced Reading High Achievement CSAP Reading ● Typical Scale Score Proficient Growth Low ● Level Percentiles High 66th − 99th Typical 35th − 65th Part Proficient ● Low 1st − 34th Unsatisfactory Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Next Year Scale Score 462 539 563 609 Achievement Level Unsatisfactory Part Proficient Part Proficient Proficient Achievement Growth Percentile 66 66 90 Growth Level High High High Growth
  17. The Big Picture Describing Student Growth Guiding Principals and Questions Combining Actual and Aspirational Growth The Colorado Growth Model Growth & Effectiveness New Directions Going from students to groups of students It’s of interest to examine schools where students demonstrate, on average, extraordinarily high and low student growth. To summarize the student growth percentiles associated with a school (or other grouping) one calculates the median of the student growth percentiles. If students were randomly assigned to schools, one expects to see a median of 50. Values greatly above or below 50 are of interest in identifying best practices or providing extra support. Examining growth with achievement sheds new light on school performance. Damian W. Betebenner Student Growth in Missouri
  18. District C: 2008 CSAP Math School Results Student Growth versus Student Achievement by Percent Free/Reduced Lunch School Percent Higher Achievement Higher Achievement Free/Reduced Lunch Lower Growth Higher Growth Percent at/above Proficient in School Less than 20 percent ● 20 to 40 percent ● 40 to 60 percent ● 60 to 80 percent ● More than 80 percent School Size 50 Students 100 Students 200 Students 30 500 Students 1,000 Students 10 Lower Growth Higher Growth Lower Achievement Lower Achievement Median of Student Growth Percentiles in School
  19. The Big Picture Describing Student Growth Guiding Principals and Questions Combining Actual and Aspirational Growth The Colorado Growth Model Growth & Effectiveness New Directions Growth, Effectiveness, and Value-Added Fundamental Premise “Good” schools bring about student growth in excess of that found at “bad” schools. “Good schools” are often called highly effective schools. What’s the relationship between growth and effectiveness? Effectiveness indicates who/what is responsible for the growth (value-added models). Yen’s questions make no mention of effectiveness placing a greater emphasis on description This work group’s name reflects a more value-added emphasis. Damian W. Betebenner Student Growth in Missouri
  20. The Big Picture Growth & Accountability Guiding Principals and Questions Web 2.0 Technologies The Colorado Growth Model References New Directions Next Steps for growth data Calculating growth quantities is the first and easiest step in the development and deployment of a growth model. The end goal is to change conversations about education through the examination and use of data. To this end, Colorado has been inspired by the Web 2.0 user-centered design philosophies and technologies. The goal is to produce data visualization and social networking tools to turn data into information for all education stakeholders and ultimately change conversations about education. Damian W. Betebenner Student Growth in Missouri
  21. The Big Picture Growth & Accountability Guiding Principals and Questions Web 2.0 Technologies The Colorado Growth Model References New Directions Descriptive Accountability “Accountability system results can have value without making causal inferences about school quality, solely from the results of student achievement measures and demographic characteristics. Treating the results as descriptive information and for identification of schools that require more intensive investigation of organizational and instructional process characteristics are potentially of considerable value. Rather than using the results of the accountability system as the sole determiner of sanctions for schools, they could be used to flag schools that need more intensive investigation to reach sound conclusions about needed improvements or judgments about quality.” R. L. Linn (2008) Damian W. Betebenner Student Growth in Missouri
  22. The Big Picture Growth & Accountability Guiding Principals and Questions Web 2.0 Technologies The Colorado Growth Model References New Directions Descriptive Accountability “This is the difference between a retrospective question of identifying fault as opposed to a prospective strategy to engineer some corrective measure, almost independent of considering whether there was blame-worthiness. And to move away from the blame-worthiness paradigm toward something that is more regulatory in nature where one might seize upon disparities or circumstances that are for some reason deemed unacceptable and engineer the interventions needed to bring about the necessary change. . . . It’s the no-fault gap closing strategy in which the effort is to build a consensus about a vision of an improved society rather than figure out where’s the person we want to pillory.” C. Edley (2006) Damian W. Betebenner Student Growth in Missouri
  23. The Big Picture Growth & Accountability Guiding Principals and Questions Web 2.0 Technologies The Colorado Growth Model References New Directions Web 2.0: Data Visualization and Social Networking The Colorado Department of Education and the Center for Assessment have been working for the last two year on developing next generation data visualization to accompany growth model data. The goal: Transform conversations about education through active engagement with data (i.e., evidence). Our efforts have received tremendous interest and recognition: Received (just recently) the 2010 annual award for Outstanding Dissemination of Educational Measurement Concepts to the Public by the National Council on Measurement in Education. Recognized by Adobe for innovative uses of their technology as an Adobe Max Award finalist in October, 2009. Multiple states signing MOUs to co-develop a cloud-based reporting platform in a non-proprietary fashion. Colorado recently devoted $2.5 million of stimulus funds to the development efforts Damian W. Betebenner Student Growth in Missouri
  24. The Big Picture Growth & Accountability Guiding Principals and Questions Web 2.0 Technologies The Colorado Growth Model References New Directions Web 2.0: Data Visualization and Social Networking With a collaborative spirit, with a collaborative platform where people can upload data, explore data, compare solutions, discuss the results, build consensus, we can engage passionate people, local communities, media and this will raise–incredibly–the amount of people who can understand what is going on. And this would have fantastic outcomes: the engagement of people, especially new generations; it would increase knowledge, unlock statistics, improve transparency and accountability of public policies, change culture, increase numerary, and in the end, improve democracy and welfare. E. Giovannini, Chief Statistician, OECD. June 2007 Damian W. Betebenner Student Growth in Missouri
  25. The Big Picture Growth & Accountability Guiding Principals and Questions Web 2.0 Technologies The Colorado Growth Model References New Directions References Betebenner, D. W. (2008). Toward a normative understanding of student growth. In Ryan, K. E. and Shepard, L. A., editors, The Future of Test-Based Educational Accountability, pages 155–170. Taylor & Francis, New York. Betebenner, D. W. (2009). Norm- and criterion-referenced student growth. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 28(4):42–51. Edley, C. (2006). Educational “Opportunity" is the highest civil rights priority. So what should researchers and lawyers do about it? Retrieved June 22, 2006 from the World Wide Web: http: //www.softconference.com/MEDIA/WMP/260407/#43.010. Linn, R. L. (2008). Educational accountability systems. In The Future of Test-Based Educational Accountability, pages 3–24. Taylor & Francis, New York. Yen, W. M. (2007). Vertical scaling and No Child Left Behind. In Dorans, N. J., Pommerich, M., and Holland, P. W., editors, Linking and Aligning Scores and Scales, pages 273–283. Springer, New York. Damian W. Betebenner Student Growth in Missouri