Parch Growth Results

Center for Assessment staff meeting · September 6, 2016

Parch Growth Results — Center for Assessment staff meeting, September 6, 2016.
Published

September 6, 2016

Event
Staff session
Slides
11
Format
Converted from Keynote

This deck is an image-based copy of the original slides. Builds and animations are flattened; the slide text is reproduced below for search and screen readers.

Slide text
  1. PARCH GROWTH RESULTS: A CROSS-STATE COMPARISON Damian W Betebenner National Center for the Improvement of Educational Assessment Dover, New Hampshire September 6th, 2016
  2. PARCC SGP ANALYSES • The PARCC consortium conducted SGP analyses following the 2016 administration. • Colorado, District of Columbia, Illinois, Massachusetts, Maryland, New Jersey, New Mexico, Rhode Island. • SGP analyses were conducted for both English Language Arts and Mathematics (including Algebra I & II, Geometry, and Integrated Math I, II, & III. • Analyses are Primarily Spring-to-Spring though in states with Fall testing, Fall-to-Spring Growth was calculated.
  3. MATHEMATICS: GRADE 4 Mean Scale Score State Median SGP Median SIMEX SGP Percentile CO 46 46 47 DC 51 52 44 IL 43 43 45 MA 59 58 65 MD 53 54 50 NJ 58 58 60 NM 46 47 39 RI 51 51 49
  4. MATHEMATICS: GRADE 5 Mean Scale Score State Median SGP Median SIMEX SGP Percentile CO 46 46 47 DC 46 47 42 IL 47 47 46 MA 48 46 65 MD 52 52 49 NJ 56 56 61 NM 51 52 39 RI 51 52 47
  5. MATHEMATICS: GRADE 8 Mean Scale Score State Median SGP Median SIMEX SGP Percentile CO 46 47 44 DC 43 45 34 IL 49 48 56 MA 59 58 72 MD 47 48 37 NJ 53 53 51 NM 48 50 35 RI 46 46 39
  6. ELA: GRADE 4 Mean Scale Score State Median SGP Median SIMEX SGP Percentile CO 53 53 51 DC 50 51 36 IL 44 44 44 MA 56 55 62 MD 47 47 47 NJ 60 60 60 NM 40 40 34 RI 48 47 47
  7. ELA: GRADE 5 Mean Scale Score State Median SGP Median SIMEX SGP Percentile CO 51 51 48 DC 54 57 36 IL 43 43 43 MA 56 54 65 MD 49 49 46 NJ 59 59 60 NM 49 51 35 RI 55 56 48
  8. ELA: GRADE 8 Mean Scale Score State Median SGP Median SIMEX SGP Percentile CO 49 49 47 DC 52 54 36 IL 46 45 45 MA 53 51 65 MD 46 46 44 NJ 59 58 61 NM 53 54 34 RI 51 51 46
  9. CONCLUSIONS • Cross state results from PARCC demonstrated both growth and status disparities. • The status disparities were more remarkable than the growth disparities. • Upcoming work will calculate growth-to-standard for each state to supplement the norm-referenced analyses.
  10. Demonstration: 2015−2016 Mathematics Norm & Criterion Referenced Growth & Achievement Baseline Referenced Percentile Growth Trajectory Scale Score 2015−2016 Achievement Percentile SGP trajectories for a 3rd grade student starting from the Level 1/Level 2 cut. Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 Grade 9 Grade 10