Using State Measures of Student Growth to Inform Local Practice

CCSSO · June 2009

Using State Measures of Student Growth to Inform Local Practice — CCSSO, June 2009.
Published

June 22, 2009

Event
Conference
Slides
16
Format
Converted from PowerPoint

This deck is an image-based copy of the original slides. Builds and animations are flattened; the slide text is reproduced below for search and screen readers.

Slide text
  1. Using State Measures of Student Growth to Inform Local Practice (or, “Organic Isn’t Just for Veggies!”) June, 2009
  2. Session Learning Objectives 1. Steps to go from data to student-level action-item 2. How and where local data fits in 3. How data quality and data use are related
  3. The Value of Buy-In in Arizona 1. Process was very organic, from both the top down and the bottom up (with a little fertilizer ) 2. Year-end state data was only good for the beginning of the following year – we are creating two types of “check point” that schools are excited about 3. Quality means the data answers the questions you need, and you trust it – teachers must feel this too!
  4. Our Process Was Very Organic and Grass-Roots 1. Good access to data for value-added research from previous positive relationships • Past relationships/credibility • Political alignment • Collaboration with authorizer • Participation in federal grant
  5. Our Process Was Very Organic and Grass-Roots 2. National and local partners focused on understanding the “quality” landscape • Building Charter School Quality grant, we were approached by CO and learned about Damian’s work in growth percentiles • Led to Arizona State Board for Charter Schools to redefine quality • Led to state policymakers taking notice
  6. Our Process Was Very Organic and Grass-Roots 3. Used the growth percentile data to create a best practices report • Highlighted how the high-growth schools got where they are • Focused on providing a “road-map” to other schools to follow
  7. Our Process Was Very Organic and Grass-Roots 4. During research, vetted growth percentile concept with schools and learned the best ways to explain it • Schools loved it • Saw credit for growth, not starting point • Started calling to see their own data
  8. Our Process Was Very Organic and Grass-Roots 5. One finding was about the importance of data- driven decision-making • “A-ha” moment for us • Realized that growth percentiles could take assessment from “end of year autopsy” to “pre-year and mid-year diagnosis.”
  9. Our Process Was Very Organic and Grass-Roots 6. Became a key talking point for all of our management team • Goal was to change the definition of quality in the state to “individual student level growth” and promote “growth to standard” instead of “one year’s growth.” • We began to vet these ideas with state officials, districts, and our schools.
  10. Our Process Was Very Organic and Grass-Roots 7. Meanwhile, we developed and marketed Best Practice workshops • Data-driven decision-making • Professional Learning Communities • Saw the growth percentile idea really appeal to them • Began to focus on how to develop tools for teachers to use it more. • Led to….
  11. Working on Three Types of “Check Point” (that schools are excited about) 1. Beginning of year check on growth based on end- of-year AIMS tests • Damian’s cool student level graphs • Class-room level data for differentiated instruction
  12. Working on Three Types of “Check Point” (that schools are excited about) 2. Online interim assessment in December • Produce mid-point growth percentiles • Drive instructional decisions between January and AIMS in March
  13. Working on Three Types of “Check Point” (that schools are excited about) 3. Online formative assessment tool tied into PLC concept • Test bank/test building • Analysis and reporting • Professional development and communication • Goal is to build teacher comfort and capacity
  14. Quality means… 1. Data answers the questions you need (i.e. you can USE it) • Has policy relevance • Has classroom relevance • Teachers can quickly understand it
  15. Quality means… 2. You trust the data • Reliable (would get same results again) • Valid (measures what you want to measure) • Transparent (we can see where the data came from and how the results were created)
  16. Final Thoughts 1. Need to treat the whole process like a change management issue 2. The state/school feedback loop is critical 3. It’s All about relationships 4. It’s a GREAT time to be in education policy!