October Flash Presentation

Center for Assessment staff meeting · October 2013

October Flash Presentation — Center for Assessment staff meeting, October 2013.
Published

October 3, 2013

Event
Staff session
Slides
4
Format
Converted from Keynote

This deck is an image-based copy of the original slides. Builds and animations are flattened; the slide text is reproduced below for search and screen readers.

Slide text
  1. West Virginia: 2012−2013 Mathematics Nevada: 2011−2012 Mathematics Norm & Criterion Referenced Growth to College Readiness Norm & Criterion Referenced Growth & Achievement Growth to Standard using End of College Ready 95 Percentile Growth Trajectory to College Readiness Course Tests 2011−2012 Achievement Percentile No Grade 9 Assessment Not College Ready 2012−2013 Achievement Percentile Scale Score Percentile Growth Trajectory Flash Presentation October 3, 2013 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 Grade 9 Grade 10 Grade 11 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 Grade 10
  2. Scratch a criterion and you’ll find a norm William Angoff Since the early development of the Colorado Growth Model and articulated Betebenner (2009) Norm- and Criterion-Referenced Student Growth I’ve argued that a complete characterization of student progress must include both a norm and criterion-referenced component. SGPs are the only growth (or VAM) methodology to seamlessly integrate norm- and criterion-referenced understanding of growth. • What is: How much growth did the student demonstrate? • What should be: How much growth did we want the student to demonstrate? • What is reasonable: How much growth was reasonable to expect?
  3. As part of growth model development in Georgia, they desire growth to standard results using both their CRCT and EOCT tests. Georgia’s current testing systems tests students in Grades 3 to 8 in 5 content areas with EOCT tests in 10 content areas. Georgia’s testing system required significant enhancements to the way in which student growth projections were produced in the SGP to allow for: • Student growth trajectories to be produced across an arbitrary set of grades and content areas. • Previously, trajectories were calculated across canonical content area/grade progressions (e.g., Reading up to grade 8) The enhancements are a part of a broader development effort to produce “career and college readiness” trajectories.
  4. West Virginia: 2012−2013 Mathematics Nevada: 2011−2012 Mathematics Norm & Criterion Referenced Growth to College Readiness Norm & Criterion Referenced Growth & Achievement College Ready 95 Percentile Growth Trajectory to College Readiness 2011−2012 Achievement Percentile No Grade 9 Assessment Not College Ready 2012−2013 Achievement Percentile Scale Score Percentile Growth Trajectory Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 Grade 9 Grade 10 Grade 11 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 Grade 10